Comment on Ask HN: Is Washington Post correct in saying Signal is unsecure?Comments−barotalomey1yI think Signal is the only usable option for trusted fully e2e-encrypted messaging today. Even the military is using it in some countries.−vbekkerm1ylook into SimpleX−barotalomey1ySince I never heard of it before, I looked it up.It's some website https://simplex.chat/ with some claims about privacy because they don't use user ID:s (uh).Do explain to me why anyone should trust this sus russian project [1] over the well regarded Signal?1: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/o... (proof of russian natinality of Evgeny Poberezkin)−barotalomey1yHad more look and learned that their privacy claim about no user ID:s is false, as they expose user IP:s:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41381204
Comments
I think Signal is the only usable option for trusted fully e2e-encrypted messaging today. Even the military is using it in some countries.
look into SimpleX
Since I never heard of it before, I looked it up.
It's some website https://simplex.chat/ with some claims about privacy because they don't use user ID:s (uh).
Do explain to me why anyone should trust this sus russian project [1] over the well regarded Signal?
1: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/o... (proof of russian natinality of Evgeny Poberezkin)
Had more look and learned that their privacy claim about no user ID:s is false, as they expose user IP:s:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41381204