Good find! Everything stated here sounds deeply familiar. At the start of COVID I did a literature review of epidemiology and was blown away by how corrupt it seems to be as a field. Evidence simply being made up, circular definitions of disease and lots of cover-ups seem to be common.
Around the time this article was published the UK had an outbreak of foot and mouth disease, triggering a terrible government response that was also based on the most absurd pseudo-science. Lots of similarities too this story. Yet they never learned anything from it.
Still, it's hard to be fully convinced by the journalist's / renegade scientists' alternative theory, seeing as the evidence seems to boil down to "trust me bro". Especially as the symptoms and timeline sound rather like what you'd expect from a transmitted pathogen rather than food poisoning. The justification for it being food related never seen to be given after the official theory was dismissed.
Thank you! I had a very similar feeling, as I had read another long-format investigative report on Covid (I don’t remember where I put the link now), which especially paralleled the Lancet magazine and high profile officials!
Comments
Good find! Everything stated here sounds deeply familiar. At the start of COVID I did a literature review of epidemiology and was blown away by how corrupt it seems to be as a field. Evidence simply being made up, circular definitions of disease and lots of cover-ups seem to be common.
Around the time this article was published the UK had an outbreak of foot and mouth disease, triggering a terrible government response that was also based on the most absurd pseudo-science. Lots of similarities too this story. Yet they never learned anything from it.
Still, it's hard to be fully convinced by the journalist's / renegade scientists' alternative theory, seeing as the evidence seems to boil down to "trust me bro". Especially as the symptoms and timeline sound rather like what you'd expect from a transmitted pathogen rather than food poisoning. The justification for it being food related never seen to be given after the official theory was dismissed.
Thank you! I had a very similar feeling, as I had read another long-format investigative report on Covid (I don’t remember where I put the link now), which especially paralleled the Lancet magazine and high profile officials!