Skip to content

Comment on Trading Program Ran Amok, With No ‘Off’ Switch

Comments

This was apparently an infrastructure problem of some sort: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/tom-joyce-knight-is-open-for-...

Infrastructure changes can be notoriously difficult to back out by simply using an "off" switch, particularly if this was some type of a firmware upgrade that impacted all of their production servers. Backing it out at a minimum would require some type of a reboot, which would cause problems with an active trades. It could very well be that they were running an Active-Active environment, they had to go Active-Passive, back out the changes from the passive environment, reboot, and surgically cut over to the passive environment. This could easily take 30 minutes.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.