This is not AGI.
> Let's take an old version of the Wikipedia page about AGI, from end of 2022
sure, its not AGI by old wikipedia definition, which imo is human-centric and more definition of superintelligence (requires ability to exceed all existing humans in all tasks). But it is AGI by current wikipedia definition.
That is literally my point... The definition of AGI has been twisted so much by the ones that claim to be on the verge of achieving it that it is not anymore in line with what AGI has always meant.
Reading wikipedia about history of the term, it sounds like term was popularized by this book: https://www.amazon.com/Artificial-General-Intelligence-Cogni... which says that general means "ability so solve variety of tasks in variety of domains", not "all tasks in all domains". So "always meant" is easily challengeable here.
Comments
sure, its not AGI by old wikipedia definition, which imo is human-centric and more definition of superintelligence (requires ability to exceed all existing humans in all tasks). But it is AGI by current wikipedia definition.
That is literally my point... The definition of AGI has been twisted so much by the ones that claim to be on the verge of achieving it that it is not anymore in line with what AGI has always meant.
Reading wikipedia about history of the term, it sounds like term was popularized by this book: https://www.amazon.com/Artificial-General-Intelligence-Cogni... which says that general means "ability so solve variety of tasks in variety of domains", not "all tasks in all domains". So "always meant" is easily challengeable here.