Skip to content

Comment on JJ Cheat Sheetparent

Comments

That looks more like a git alias than a job for an entirely new tool, to me. How many of the core functions do you really need to cover before `jj` itself becomes redundant?

I apologize if my sibling comment sounded harsh. I think you were saying that jj could be implemented as some Git aliases. Given the information available in this thread, that might seem reasonable. I didn't realize that this thread did not include a link to the project's docs. Sorry about that.

I think you misunderstood. Did you see the list of features? My example is not the only thing jj does.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.