Comment on OAuth 2.0 and the Road to HellparentComments−pfraze14yIf I were ever involved in a standards process, my gut feeling is that I'd want working code for all serious proposals. Does that seem feasible?Perhaps the WG would produce a set of use-case prototypes which proposals are built on.−ivarkotnik14yOr at least require each and every voting member to implement the standard in a freely chosen programming language. On second thought... Might not work so good for large standards as HTML5 though, writing your own parser, renderer and layouter :)−rfugger14yOr maybe only browser makers should be deciding what HTML is?
Comments
If I were ever involved in a standards process, my gut feeling is that I'd want working code for all serious proposals. Does that seem feasible?
Perhaps the WG would produce a set of use-case prototypes which proposals are built on.
Or at least require each and every voting member to implement the standard in a freely chosen programming language. On second thought... Might not work so good for large standards as HTML5 though, writing your own parser, renderer and layouter :)
Or maybe only browser makers should be deciding what HTML is?