Skip to content

Comment on 2-Year Call of Duty False Permanent Ban Reversed by Court Caseparent

Comments

Yes if they banned him for no reason he would have no case but steam only shows bans for cheating so this problem wouldn't have come up anyways.

The burden of proof in civil cases is on both parties equally. They are decided on the preponderance of evidence basis. So in this case the author only needed to show that it was more likely that he wasn't cheating than he was cheating.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.