I'm pretty sure you can explain the difference in averages between men & women's sex partners by a very large variance. E.g. village bicycles & nuns vs regular man-slut Joe six-pack.
Let us examine the Village of Virtuous Women, where there are 100 men and 100 women. 99 wives are faithful to their husbands. All the men are unfaithful with the 100th wife (except, of course, her husband -- who I really feel for).
Average number of partners per man: (2 + 2 + 2 + ... + 1) / 100 = 1.99
Average number of partners per woman: (1 + 1 + 1... + 100) / 100 = 1.99
You can also justify this with "Sum over a gender of number of sexual partners equals the sum over the gender of sexual partnerships, and if we only consider heterosexual partnerships, then this must be symmetric for both genders. Thus, since number of people in both genders is approximately equal, average number of sexual partners must be approximately equal."
So what actually causes the disparity? It has to be either a) untruthfulness or b) unsampled outliers. For example, if in the Village of Faithful Women the unfaithful wife got missed in your phone survey, you'd blow the results completely now wouldn't you.
But in the instant case, it is highly likely that the answer is in fact untruthfulness (both overreporting and underreporting).
Not quite. A ratio of 7 to 4 means that the number of heterosexual males is 7/4 times the number of heterosexual females. Since the ratio of men to women in the US is ~50-50 (as well as in most countries), If that statistic is correct, at least 42% of all men are homosexual. A laughable claim. Whenever you read statistics, _always_ take them with a grain of salt and run them through a common sense analyzer.
Comments
I'm pretty sure you can explain the difference in averages between men & women's sex partners by a very large variance. E.g. village bicycles & nuns vs regular man-slut Joe six-pack.
That wouldn't do it by itself, actually.
Let us examine the Village of Virtuous Women, where there are 100 men and 100 women. 99 wives are faithful to their husbands. All the men are unfaithful with the 100th wife (except, of course, her husband -- who I really feel for).
Average number of partners per man: (2 + 2 + 2 + ... + 1) / 100 = 1.99
Average number of partners per woman: (1 + 1 + 1... + 100) / 100 = 1.99
You can also justify this with "Sum over a gender of number of sexual partners equals the sum over the gender of sexual partnerships, and if we only consider heterosexual partnerships, then this must be symmetric for both genders. Thus, since number of people in both genders is approximately equal, average number of sexual partners must be approximately equal."
So what actually causes the disparity? It has to be either a) untruthfulness or b) unsampled outliers. For example, if in the Village of Faithful Women the unfaithful wife got missed in your phone survey, you'd blow the results completely now wouldn't you.
But in the instant case, it is highly likely that the answer is in fact untruthfulness (both overreporting and underreporting).
Not quite. A ratio of 7 to 4 means that the number of heterosexual males is 7/4 times the number of heterosexual females. Since the ratio of men to women in the US is ~50-50 (as well as in most countries), If that statistic is correct, at least 42% of all men are homosexual. A laughable claim. Whenever you read statistics, _always_ take them with a grain of salt and run them through a common sense analyzer.