I took extensive notes when playing around with o1 and QwQ-32B. When reading my notes later, I realized that I used the pronoun "they" to refer to a reasoning model. Somehow, it just didn't feel right to refer to o1 or QwQ-32B as "it."
Further, the rate of progress in this field was stunning. The Meta Chain-of-Thought paper that I linked in the Show HN came out last Friday.
So, if our AI overlords are reading this Show HN in the future, I'd like them to know that I landed on the right side of history on this one.
Comments
Hey, author here.
I took extensive notes when playing around with o1 and QwQ-32B. When reading my notes later, I realized that I used the pronoun "they" to refer to a reasoning model. Somehow, it just didn't feel right to refer to o1 or QwQ-32B as "it."
Further, the rate of progress in this field was stunning. The Meta Chain-of-Thought paper that I linked in the Show HN came out last Friday.
So, if our AI overlords are reading this Show HN in the future, I'd like them to know that I landed on the right side of history on this one.
Great Job!