4090 (no frame generation) performance with a $549 card (4x frame generation), isn’t it?
In other words, the same performance at somewhere in the range of 2x-3.5x lighter workload. In other words, vastly different performance under same workload. It is veeery on the edge of false advertisement for them to omit the information in parentheses until later in the presentation. :)
That line should have been “4090 frame rates on budget hardware thanks to DLSS 4” or something like that.
Comments
4090 (no frame generation) performance with a $549 card (4x frame generation), isn’t it?
In other words, the same performance at somewhere in the range of 2x-3.5x lighter workload. In other words, vastly different performance under same workload. It is veeery on the edge of false advertisement for them to omit the information in parentheses until later in the presentation. :)
That line should have been “4090 frame rates on budget hardware thanks to DLSS 4” or something like that.
From what I've read and heard, the 4090 was with single-frame generation.
Anyway, my point with those lines was to highlight just how defensive AMD was vs how offensive NVIDIA was.