The article makes its main point to dispute the “City” characterization and how this is “overblown”.
I can only assume trkaky posted in the same spirit of discrediting the news, which I find worth “taking action” against. It might be old news for people in the field, and not reported faithfully (as usual), but what’s the purpose of raining down on one of the most interesting archeological discoveries in the Americas?
Comments
Read, parse for keywords to take action against - what's the difference?
The article makes its main point to dispute the “City” characterization and how this is “overblown”.
I can only assume trkaky posted in the same spirit of discrediting the news, which I find worth “taking action” against. It might be old news for people in the field, and not reported faithfully (as usual), but what’s the purpose of raining down on one of the most interesting archeological discoveries in the Americas?