Skip to content

Comment on Show HN: Killed by LLM – I catalogued AI benchmarks we thought would last years

Comments

For my year end I collected data on on how quickly AI benchmarks are becoming obsolete (https://r0bk.github.io/killedbyllm/). Some interesting findings:

2023: GPT-4 was truely something new - It didn't just beat SOTA scores, it completely saturated several benchmarks - First time humanity created something that can beat the turing test - Created a clear "before/after" divide

2024: Others caught up, progress in fits and spurts - O1/O3 used test-time compute to saturate math and reasoning benchmarks - Sonnet 3.5/ 4o incremented some benchmarks into saturation, and pushed new visual evals into saturation - Llama 3/ Qwen 2.5 brought Open Weight models to be competitive across the board

And yet with all these saturated benchmarks, I personally still can't trust a model to do the same work as a junior - our benchmarks aren't yet measuring real-world reliability.

Data & sources (if you'd like to contribute): https://github.com/R0bk/killedbyllm Interactive timeline: https://r0bk.github.io/killedbyllm/

P.S. I've had a hard time deciding what benchmarks are significant enough to include. If you know of other benchmarks (including those yet to be saturated) that help answer "can AI do X" questions then please let me know.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.