Skip to content

Comment on Curl-Impersonateparent

Comments

They've been planning this stuff for a long time...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next-Generation_Secure_Computi...

...and we're seeing the puzzle pieces fall into place. Mandated driver signing, TPMs, and more recently remote attestation. "Security" has always been the excuse --- securing their control over you.

Another trending thread right now is Pegasus/Predator; as much as it may be a facade, to say MS (or any OS vendor) has no business working on security/secure computing is demonstrably false.

I have no problem with them working on security in the service of the user. The problem is with them claiming to do that, but instead doing the opposite.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.