Comment on Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye GlassparentComments−Fuzzwah14y> There is no indications that Mann was actively taking pictures of strangers.Except for all the photos in the blog post.−jonmrodriguez14yIf you actually read the post, you would see that the device would normally purge its buffer after it finished augmenting / vision processing those frames. Only because it was forcefully shut off was the data retained.−theorique14yAn angry rent-a-cop in the face of the person wielding the camera would not know this.−Fuzzwah14yIf you're willing to believe that via a malfunction he was able to get photos off, you've missed my point.Its possible because they're there. Anything beyond that is arguing against the reality of the photos on the web page.
Comments
> There is no indications that Mann was actively taking pictures of strangers.
Except for all the photos in the blog post.
If you actually read the post, you would see that the device would normally purge its buffer after it finished augmenting / vision processing those frames. Only because it was forcefully shut off was the data retained.
An angry rent-a-cop in the face of the person wielding the camera would not know this.
If you're willing to believe that via a malfunction he was able to get photos off, you've missed my point.
Its possible because they're there. Anything beyond that is arguing against the reality of the photos on the web page.