I love the promise of ranked choice voting (and other schemes). Properly implemented it seems like it could be a magic bullet to balancing some of the political divide and drawing out candidates and ideas that would satisfy more than just the extremes...
But, oh boy: we have trouble with simple plurality voting. How would you explain the outcome to people if it was implemented broadly?
Comments
I love the promise of ranked choice voting (and other schemes). Properly implemented it seems like it could be a magic bullet to balancing some of the political divide and drawing out candidates and ideas that would satisfy more than just the extremes...
But, oh boy: we have trouble with simple plurality voting. How would you explain the outcome to people if it was implemented broadly?