What is your purposed mechanism/leagally authorative/enforcing body to stop two multinational corporations from incorporating in any one of their markets?
Even if they where headquarterd in US and strictly trading on US market, corporations have rights akin to human beings.
Con-agra, unliver, comcast. All these merged in the US just fine under a very stringent FTC. How could they possibly prevent a foreign multinational corp from doing the same?
They’d be forced to divest from some of their US subsidiaries, so one of the brands would become an independent car company with brand and technology licensing agreements but independent management and shareholders.
For example when InBev merged with Anheuser-Busch they had to sell Labbat’s USA operations to FIFCO USA with geographic exclusive rights to their brands to get the deal through the US DoJ. EU regulators forced Dow and DuPont to divest of much of their crop protection stuff in Europe to complete the US merger.
Comments
What is your purposed mechanism/leagally authorative/enforcing body to stop two multinational corporations from incorporating in any one of their markets?
Even if they where headquarterd in US and strictly trading on US market, corporations have rights akin to human beings.
Con-agra, unliver, comcast. All these merged in the US just fine under a very stringent FTC. How could they possibly prevent a foreign multinational corp from doing the same?
They’d be forced to divest from some of their US subsidiaries, so one of the brands would become an independent car company with brand and technology licensing agreements but independent management and shareholders.
For example when InBev merged with Anheuser-Busch they had to sell Labbat’s USA operations to FIFCO USA with geographic exclusive rights to their brands to get the deal through the US DoJ. EU regulators forced Dow and DuPont to divest of much of their crop protection stuff in Europe to complete the US merger.