you're kinda authoritarian aren't ya?
basically, if I got it right, you think that if anyone uses their freedom as an individual to act in any way you and the collective consciousness you follow disapproves then it's ok to limit that person rights
and you also think it's ok to just embed your vision of the world as a framework(like, facebook forcing this behaviour down everyones throat) because if everyone would just think like you do, everything would be better?
Well I don't agree and I'll never do and I'll also stand up against, otherwise it may well happen!
No, you don't have it right. First of all, I don't see how "rights" ever enter into it. How is it a right, in any sense of the word, to have hidden when you've read someone else's message? That's what this is about.
>and you also think it's ok to just embed your vision of the world as a framework
Just.. no. I never said that, or hinted at it. Stop reading motivations into my beliefs that do not exist.
well I was just trying to make the point on the implications some forms of viewing things and doors they leave open
but I guess this is also aching to political/ideological views, as I am very libertarian... Anyway, this argument has lost its purpose, better let it die, be good!
Comments
you're kinda authoritarian aren't ya? basically, if I got it right, you think that if anyone uses their freedom as an individual to act in any way you and the collective consciousness you follow disapproves then it's ok to limit that person rights
and you also think it's ok to just embed your vision of the world as a framework(like, facebook forcing this behaviour down everyones throat) because if everyone would just think like you do, everything would be better?
Well I don't agree and I'll never do and I'll also stand up against, otherwise it may well happen!
this is a nice article that touches this topic: http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Privacy-Matters-Even-if/127...
No, you don't have it right. First of all, I don't see how "rights" ever enter into it. How is it a right, in any sense of the word, to have hidden when you've read someone else's message? That's what this is about.
>and you also think it's ok to just embed your vision of the world as a framework
Just.. no. I never said that, or hinted at it. Stop reading motivations into my beliefs that do not exist.
well I was just trying to make the point on the implications some forms of viewing things and doors they leave open
but I guess this is also aching to political/ideological views, as I am very libertarian... Anyway, this argument has lost its purpose, better let it die, be good!