Fine, I thought the context was obviously Google's search engine monopoly.
ruled that the tech giant has illegally maintained a monopoly through the billions of dollars in annual payments it makes to partners to secure the default search engine position on popular web browsers and mobile phones
Google search is about to be made irrelevant by AI, and yes I believe it is a stretch to compare Google's search "monopoly" to Microsoft's browser monopoly of yore.
Comments
Cutting the source off mid-sentence is disingenuous.
Fine, I thought the context was obviously Google's search engine monopoly.
It's still a stretch by the judge, and this article is a good hint that the ruling may be weak: https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/23/six-weak-spots-judg...
The same argument that they used against Microsoft 20 years ago is a "stretch?"
Google search is about to be made irrelevant by AI, and yes I believe it is a stretch to compare Google's search "monopoly" to Microsoft's browser monopoly of yore.