Have you systematically tested this approach? It sounds like you are reporting on your good vibes. Your writing is strictly anecdotal.

I’ve been working with AI, too. I see what I’m guessing is the same unreliability that you admit in the last part of your article. For some reason, you are sanguine about it, whereas I see it as a serious problem.

You say you aren’t complacent, but your words don’t seem to address the complacency issue. “More tests” does not mean better testing, or even good enough testing.

Google “automation bias” and tell me what policies and procedures or training is in place to avoid it.