My point was that it was no longer accessible via normal HN perusing (went through a couple pages of stories), which I found odd since it was fourth or some such an hour prior!
To the 1st q: comments > upvotes indicated that it was generating drama, pending judicial review (it’s a reasonably nonGoodhartian measure, impervious even to meta from the likes of we)
Fwiw i really like the top comment (also related to the differentiable (for Rao observers: hypernormal) beast at the heart of Goodhart’s law)
And the second comment hints at a possible interesting non-Varian framing of solutions to “common antiresource pool” (nonexcludable but rivalrous antigoods) problems
Comments
Hey dang, why was this story completely removed?
It was near the top an hour or so ago, and now I can't even find it!
Try the standard HN web page; it has a Search: box at the bottom, which will take you to something like https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastWeek&page=0&prefix=fal...
My point was that it was no longer accessible via normal HN perusing (went through a couple pages of stories), which I found odd since it was fourth or some such an hour prior!
To the 1st q: comments > upvotes indicated that it was generating drama, pending judicial review (it’s a reasonably nonGoodhartian measure, impervious even to meta from the likes of we)
Fwiw i really like the top comment (also related to the differentiable (for Rao observers: hypernormal) beast at the heart of Goodhart’s law)
And the second comment hints at a possible interesting non-Varian framing of solutions to “common antiresource pool” (nonexcludable but rivalrous antigoods) problems
Interesting, thanks for the clarification!