Skip to content

Comment on How incubators hurt startupsparent

Comments

A few ways:

1) The "pay" might slow down the founders' progress into a proper founder mindset, i.e. "we need to make revenues, dammit". In that way, it would hurt.

2) Many incubators I've encountered think they're adding value by imposing some kind of structure... requiring milestones, etc. For some startups, this may be suitable, but for others, it's completely wrong and will slow them down, discourage them, or even lead them in the wrong direction.

3) Good advice is worth its weight - bad advice can be the opposite. Get some convincing advice by someone who has no idea what they're talking about, and it could be very costly.

Agree completely. It really all depends on the startup and the founders, but I wouldn't consider anything other than a top 10 incubator.

For less than top 10 incubators, I think they could be great for inexperienced founders or someone looking for some help. Building connections are a big part of the incubator experience as well.

Good points. Will be great to summ-up all possible drawbacks and make a comparison table for all interesting incubators. What are other bad factors worth considering?

ADD: the biggest drawback I can think of is requiring to have a co-founder when sole founder would do just fine.

Many incubators are also geared towards VC-style companies going for multi-million exits. That might not be a good fit for all founders. I went to MicroConf and it was really refreshing to get advice and encouragement toward building a sustainable small business.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.