I've tried both in order to archive EOL websites and I've had better luck with wget, it seems to recognize more links/resources and do a better job so it was probably not a bad choice.
Conversely, httrack was the only tool that could archive the JS-heavy microsite my realtor made to sell our old house. The command-line interface is horrendous, but it does handle rewriting complex sites better than wget does.
Comments
I've tried both in order to archive EOL websites and I've had better luck with wget, it seems to recognize more links/resources and do a better job so it was probably not a bad choice.
Conversely, httrack was the only tool that could archive the JS-heavy microsite my realtor made to sell our old house. The command-line interface is horrendous, but it does handle rewriting complex sites better than wget does.