Skip to content

Comment on Famous AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions from People Stealing His Workparent

Comments

If any if the training set is public domain or creative commons, I'd argue that this make the image at best an integration work, not derivative nor fair use, and as bits from the images are indistinguishable from each other, you shouldn't be able to license it.

Like code generated from models trained on AGPL/GPLv3 licensed code should also be AGPL/GPLv3.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.