It had his home address, phone numbers and social security numbers. A reasonable person would just redact those before publishing and then it wouldn't have been an issue.
Do you have evidence of this? Because otherwise it seems pretty reasonable to ban someone for posting that kind of information. If someone posted the same data on Kamala or Tim I’d expect to see them banned.
Do I have evidence of Elon Musk's private thoughts? Let me look ...
it seems pretty reasonable
It seems like overkill to me. Harris's and Wallz's residences are well known.
Sophisticated public manipulators - and I think we can call Musk one of those - of course don't openly discuss it. One way to analyze the action is to look at the outcome: Musk is certainly sophisticated enough to anticipate the outcome and that would factor into his choice. Cui bono?
Comments
It had his home address, phone numbers and social security numbers. A reasonable person would just redact those before publishing and then it wouldn't have been an issue.
There could be a bit of validity to the complaint, but don't imagine for a moment that it's not being used to pursue the larger issue.
Do you have evidence of this? Because otherwise it seems pretty reasonable to ban someone for posting that kind of information. If someone posted the same data on Kamala or Tim I’d expect to see them banned.
Do I have evidence of Elon Musk's private thoughts? Let me look ...
It seems like overkill to me. Harris's and Wallz's residences are well known.
Sophisticated public manipulators - and I think we can call Musk one of those - of course don't openly discuss it. One way to analyze the action is to look at the outcome: Musk is certainly sophisticated enough to anticipate the outcome and that would factor into his choice. Cui bono?
These are all redacted in the current version, including his real estate records.