Comment on The port of the Windows 95 Start Menu was not all it seemedComments−hi-v-rocknroll1yWindows 2000 ("NT 5") was the most usable of that era (just a bit later). It was stable, solid, and had a responsive UI.−hulitu1yIt was the first NT to have DirectX. It was the best of both worlds NT and 9x. Then the decline started.−ngcazz1yWinXP was mostly a cosmetic upgrade on Win2K right? AFAIR there strictly were no technical reasons why Win2K wouldn't be able to run XP software, only stuff like version checks and what not
Comments
Windows 2000 ("NT 5") was the most usable of that era (just a bit later). It was stable, solid, and had a responsive UI.
It was the first NT to have DirectX. It was the best of both worlds NT and 9x. Then the decline started.
WinXP was mostly a cosmetic upgrade on Win2K right? AFAIR there strictly were no technical reasons why Win2K wouldn't be able to run XP software, only stuff like version checks and what not