Skip to content

Comment on Udacity aims to teach 160,000 students statisticsparent

Comments

I'm not familiar with the courses in question, but my impression is that basic statistics is much easier than basic crypto. Obviously, either one could be made arbitrarily difficult, but I've seen more people struggle with things like RSA than with T-tests and distributions.

Also, I think statistics knowledge is more relevant, especially to everyday life, than crypto. Not to say that crypto is unimportant, but statistics is applicable everywhere and changes how you view pretty much everything.

So I think there are some reasons for the stats course to have less attrition than crypto.

It would be interesting to see the attrition of other similar classes at both Udacity and Coursera.

That would be an interesting comparison, but I'm not sure what it would show. Comparative difficulty of course material? How good the platforms are? The required student time investment? Perceived rewards? All of these probably contribute in some way

It certainly is a wide new world of possibilities, especially for those of us who want to continue semi-structured learning outside of a university environment.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.