Skip to content

Comment on We've now partially replicated Reflection Llama 3.1 70B's eval claims

Comments

And the twit is gone after public outroar.

Now there claim that 70B saw worse performance than Llama 3.1 70B (and obviously worse than closed source alternatives)[1].

Outstanding questions:

- What exactly did they "partially replicate"

- Why Redditors were able to identify all the details (wrapped Claude, wrapped GPT4o, initial prompt, details of finetuned Lllama 3.0, not 3.1) and ArtificialAnlys was not?

- Why after revealing the truth they still write "We are not clear", "We are not clear"?

[1] https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/1832965630472995220

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.