It's certainly a good idea to know golang while using something like pocketbase.
However, one of the strengths of pocketbase, I think, is that the creator chose to add bindings for a very well known scripting language (js) to allow projects to be rapidly developed. It feels like django rethought.
Using go for the base of your project and then gluing things together via scripting seems like a good idea. It's quite a big feature of the framework.
performance seems pretty solid too, removing one of my prime motivators for switching to Go for extension work. PocketBase just seems to have made a lot of great decisions based on the conceptual integrity of the project goals.
Comments
It's certainly a good idea to know golang while using something like pocketbase.
However, one of the strengths of pocketbase, I think, is that the creator chose to add bindings for a very well known scripting language (js) to allow projects to be rapidly developed. It feels like django rethought.
Using go for the base of your project and then gluing things together via scripting seems like a good idea. It's quite a big feature of the framework.
performance seems pretty solid too, removing one of my prime motivators for switching to Go for extension work. PocketBase just seems to have made a lot of great decisions based on the conceptual integrity of the project goals.
I've used Pocketbase for some other projects. A quick small web app, but it was so easy.