I clicked on this story expecting the usual blatantly biased and totally pointless drivel from this guy. I wasn't disappointed. He keeps raising the bar for embarrassing tech commentary and that's why I will keep reading him knowing full well I shouldn't waste my time on that kind of trolling.
Now I'm even wasting your time by commenting on it. Please vote me down to -10 or I'll have to fagellate myself for an entire week!
The flaws in this post are the same as in every single one of his posts. He makes it sound like he was doing some kind of analysis when it's really just a tortured justification for his preconceptions. It's disingenuous.
What he usually does when he writes about Apple technologies is to look for the good even in the obviously bad. In this piece about a Microsoft technology, he goes out of his way to ignore everything that might potentially be good or interesting.
Comments
I clicked on this story expecting the usual blatantly biased and totally pointless drivel from this guy. I wasn't disappointed. He keeps raising the bar for embarrassing tech commentary and that's why I will keep reading him knowing full well I shouldn't waste my time on that kind of trolling.
Now I'm even wasting your time by commenting on it. Please vote me down to -10 or I'll have to fagellate myself for an entire week!
It's OK, the discussion that he generated here on HN is well worth whatever flaws are in his post.
I didn't downvote you but it would be helpful you cited flaws in the article.
The flaws in this post are the same as in every single one of his posts. He makes it sound like he was doing some kind of analysis when it's really just a tortured justification for his preconceptions. It's disingenuous.
What he usually does when he writes about Apple technologies is to look for the good even in the obviously bad. In this piece about a Microsoft technology, he goes out of his way to ignore everything that might potentially be good or interesting.