Bug was clearly part of the lexicon already. Otherwise no one would have written "First actual case of bug being found." And it wouldn't have been so funny.
Pedant "debunking" obvious joke in a JSTOR article is pretty funny in its own right, though. I hope Matthew Wills will explain how chickens don't cross roads next!
And the article that reddit post links to is titled "First computer bug found 66 years ago" which quotes it but fails the notice the distinction between "first actual computer bug" and "first actual case of bug being found" and turning that into the reddit title "The first computer bug ever discovered was a real insect: a moth trapped between the relays".
"This was litterally the first thing we were taught in programming class at uni. You'd be surprised at how many things actually makes sense if you know the story behind them!"
I've never heard the joke version of this story. It's only people earnestly explaining that this is where the word bug comes from. Or people debunking that.
"First actual bug" gets turned into "first bug was an actual bug" in the retelling, and people are pretty insistent about it.
Computer people adopted a term in use for more than half a century and brought it into the digital world. The wording in the Harvard log book—“first actual case of a bug being found”—suggests the computer programmers and engineers there were already quite familiar with the time-honored usage and were remarking on the novelty of finding an actual insect bugging up the computer. “Debug,” by the way, was also used in an 1945 issue of the Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, which Shapiro takes to suggest it was “probably preceded by several years of oral use in engineering slang.”
I like how it's expressed in Dirk Gently - "Schrödinger's Cat isn't a real experiment. It's just an illustration for arguing about the idea [...] Schrödinger put
forward this idea to illustrate what he thought was absurd about quantum theory." -- Douglas Adams
Comments
Bug was clearly part of the lexicon already. Otherwise no one would have written "First actual case of bug being found." And it wouldn't have been so funny.
Pedant "debunking" obvious joke in a JSTOR article is pretty funny in its own right, though. I hope Matthew Wills will explain how chickens don't cross roads next!
It's apparently not obvious because I always see people misunderstanding it (followed by corrections in the replies, generally).[0]
[0] Random example: https://old.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/4g0j3r/til_the_firs...
And the article that reddit post links to is titled "First computer bug found 66 years ago" which quotes it but fails the notice the distinction between "first actual computer bug" and "first actual case of bug being found" and turning that into the reddit title "The first computer bug ever discovered was a real insect: a moth trapped between the relays".
"This was litterally the first thing we were taught in programming class at uni. You'd be surprised at how many things actually makes sense if you know the story behind them!"
Sigh.
I've never heard the joke version of this story. It's only people earnestly explaining that this is where the word bug comes from. Or people debunking that.
"First actual bug" gets turned into "first bug was an actual bug" in the retelling, and people are pretty insistent about it.
The article addresses this:
Schrödinger's cat is something that I have always assumed to obviously be a joke and nobody was expected to argue it literally.
I like how it's expressed in Dirk Gently - "Schrödinger's Cat isn't a real experiment. It's just an illustration for arguing about the idea [...] Schrödinger put forward this idea to illustrate what he thought was absurd about quantum theory." -- Douglas Adams