Skip to content

Comment on Brazil blocks Starlink bank accountsparent

Comments

As I understand it, X was fined, didn't pay, and the judge pierced a few corporate veils to discover that Starlink and X share a majority owner.

Starlink and X share a majority owner

Musk doesn’t own a majority of Starlink or SpaceX. (SpaceX owns Starlink. SpaceX is controlled by Musk. But he owns less than 50% of the shares.)

Musk owns 79% of voting shares of spacex (but yes, only 42% of equity). I guess it depends on your definition of “owns”, but its not unreasonable to say he owns spacex.

He had to pierce veils to figure that out? Couldn’t he just check Wikipedia like everyone else?

Is this legal in the US?

If company A owns B and C; and C does something bad, can A or B be fined?

“Piercing the corporate veil” isn’t about discovering something that is a secret. It’s a legal principle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil

Is this legal in the US?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil#Un...

that's the idea of "limited liability". it has a lot of downsides in practice.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.