Skip to content

Comment on An open-source flow battery kitparent

Comments

Flow batteries are optimized for cost and capacity. Not weight, nor volume/energy density, nor instantaneous power delivery. In the case of some iron flow designs, add in "dirt-cheap, non-toxic materials."

A pair of 55 gallon drums equals 7.4kWh, and I'm guessing a lot of us could easily find that much space in our basements. That's enough to power 300W of load 24x7 (a modern fridge is about 60W. 100W will get you really far in terms of LED lighting given that most "60W" bulbs are well under 10W these days.)

One "car battery" sized LiFePO4 battery is about 1400Wh, and costs anywhere from $100 to $500+ depending on the manufacturer/reseller.

I'm a little mystified why they didn't go with a simpler iron-flow design as it is very cheap, and can be nearly completely non-toxic.

The actor I'm mildly paying attention to is Lockheed-Martin, who have an energy systems group that's working on flow batteries. Judging by patents, their flow battery likely uses various transition element ions that are kept in solution with any of a variety of organic ligands. The wide variety of chemistries is the attractive part, since they present many knobs to twiddle for optimization.

Iron plating is a hydrogen evolution nightmare. It's interesting for sure, but not feasible for a simple demonstration system, due to pH issues and oxidation state drift from hydrogen evolution. We do plan to explore it in the future, and move onto larger cells/stacks that offer practical amounts of storage.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.