Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: How do companies still justify LeetCode

Comments

I get that they need to cut a large amount of people before live interviews

You've just answered your own question. Leetcode is meant to be a filter, nothing more.

but hackerrank/code signal have the ability to test

I'm not familiar with those things, but I don't think companies using things like leetcode actually care how good they are at skills/knowledge testing. I think they just want a coarse filter that doesn't depend on a human making initial assessments. Leetcode does that.

And it works! For instance, I can't imagine being willing to engage in a leetcode test to get a job, so I am automatically filtered out of some positions without them doing a thing.

What about during live interviews though? Not sure if I see the justification for DSA interviews there anymore

I've never been given anything like a leetcode test during live interviews, so I didn't know that was a thing.

I'd take it as the interviewers being lazy and perhaps a sign that they think there's a technical solution to every human problem.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.