interests of a vocal minority at the expense of everyone else
Sorry, but this doesn't make sense. You're commenting on a registered initiative which needs 1M signatures with minimums in a number of countries to be considered. The process itself is there to limit the idea of a vocal minority. Either it's true and we can disregard the initiative, or it will reach 1M proving it's not just a vocal minority.
with the natural lifecycle of live service games
It covers games which don't need to be "live" just as well. That will cover singleplayer titles with online check requirements.
Also, what is the "natural lifecycle" for games? The bullshit business ideas created by companies mostly in the last 10 years? What part of that is "natural"?
Comments
That's for the EU to decide.
Sorry, but this doesn't make sense. You're commenting on a registered initiative which needs 1M signatures with minimums in a number of countries to be considered. The process itself is there to limit the idea of a vocal minority. Either it's true and we can disregard the initiative, or it will reach 1M proving it's not just a vocal minority.
It covers games which don't need to be "live" just as well. That will cover singleplayer titles with online check requirements.
Also, what is the "natural lifecycle" for games? The bullshit business ideas created by companies mostly in the last 10 years? What part of that is "natural"?