Comment on Intel's Day of Reckoning Arrives: 15,000 Jobs Will Be EliminatedparentComments−jncfhnb2yA lot of people provide negative value. Not net negative, in their work is less valuable than their salary, but actually negative value in that they just slow things down, waste resources, or prevent innovation for their own job security−lawlessone2yheir work is less valuable than their salary, but actually negative value in that they just slow things downi don't buy it. . if those 15k people were truly a problem before why weren't they already removed?−jncfhnb2yChange is hard, firing people isn’t fun, and incentives don’t always align−Tempest19812yI would guess that's < 5%, whereas "a lot" sounds like 30 or 50%
Comments
A lot of people provide negative value. Not net negative, in their work is less valuable than their salary, but actually negative value in that they just slow things down, waste resources, or prevent innovation for their own job security
i don't buy it. . if those 15k people were truly a problem before why weren't they already removed?
Change is hard, firing people isn’t fun, and incentives don’t always align
I would guess that's < 5%, whereas "a lot" sounds like 30 or 50%