It is using pre hype old version of GPT. So it is quite dishonest that you would have to use this one to prove a point. It may work as a joke, but the model that the hype is for (GPT4) wouldn't perform that poorly.
So it is actually evidence in favour of how strong the gap is between pre hype and after.
Comments
This is amazing. An antidote to the mesmerisation.
I'm taking this to work to show an executive who is desperate to integrate AI into the day to day operations of a college.
That's silly. You may as well bring a telegraph to show how bad the idea is the internet is.
There are better, more reasonable arguments against too much AI hype.
It is using pre hype old version of GPT. So it is quite dishonest that you would have to use this one to prove a point. It may work as a joke, but the model that the hype is for (GPT4) wouldn't perform that poorly.
So it is actually evidence in favour of how strong the gap is between pre hype and after.
This is not the model that caused the hype.