Comment on Rye LanguageparentComments−RodgerTheGreat2yREBOL-family languages (including Logo) don't eagerly evaluate expressions like a Lisp, and therefore can use ordinary functions/operators in places that would otherwise need to be special forms and/or macros.−middayc2yExactly ... I tried to explain this here: https://ryelang.org/meet_rye/basics/if_either/−bsder2ySo, you're passing around textual source code chunks? How do you force evaluation?I don't find this impossible. I have seen this in John Shutt's Kernel, for example. https://ftp.cs.wpi.edu/pub/techreports/pdf/05-07.pdfBut I'm just not seeing the mechanisms I expect for such a language.−RodgerTheGreat2yNot strings; token lists.You can evaluate lists with `do`, or through functions which in turn use `do` on their arguments.
Comments
REBOL-family languages (including Logo) don't eagerly evaluate expressions like a Lisp, and therefore can use ordinary functions/operators in places that would otherwise need to be special forms and/or macros.
Exactly ... I tried to explain this here: https://ryelang.org/meet_rye/basics/if_either/
So, you're passing around textual source code chunks? How do you force evaluation?
I don't find this impossible. I have seen this in John Shutt's Kernel, for example. https://ftp.cs.wpi.edu/pub/techreports/pdf/05-07.pdf
But I'm just not seeing the mechanisms I expect for such a language.
Not strings; token lists.
You can evaluate lists with `do`, or through functions which in turn use `do` on their arguments.