As resident layman and LLM/chatgpt hater, I am offended on behalf of dang. He is not replaceable with a real person; an automated replacement is insulting to even consider.
I didn't say replace. I said replicate. Or, put another way, capture the essence of his moderation style. This could be useful for the rest of the world that's impoverished in dangs.
Comments
I wonder if we could train DangGPT that would reliably replicate dang's curation and moderation decisions (as distinct from just talking like him).
As resident layman and LLM/chatgpt hater, I am offended on behalf of dang. He is not replaceable with a real person; an automated replacement is insulting to even consider.
I didn't say replace. I said replicate. Or, put another way, capture the essence of his moderation style. This could be useful for the rest of the world that's impoverished in dangs.