Google is majorly sabotaging their own future position in search dominance. Stuff like this is taking a hammer to their reputation. It's increasingly clear that their priorities are pleasing people and corporations that are in power, not their users. It doesn't seem to be impacting normies much yet, but people I never expected to even think about alternative search engines are starting to experiment. Duck duck go could be a big beneficiary of this if they're able to deliver.
I see it the other way around. They’re sabotaging AI in order to maintain their dominance on search. If AI was to advance in some future form it might even substitute search altogether. By making it less reliable you keep your cash cow secure.
For their own AI, that's definitely possible, but with other strong competitors, that seems like a super risky move. They clearly are sabotaging their own AI, but I tend to think that's because their risk analysis indicated that regulators and influencers are more of a threat than users, so they are acting accordingly.
For the rest of the market you push the agenda of regulation because AI is potentially dangerous. More regulation means that the technology becomes less usable and its adoption is stalled. And that's something that Google is promoting for years, not just now that the field exploded.
Comments
Google is majorly sabotaging their own future position in search dominance. Stuff like this is taking a hammer to their reputation. It's increasingly clear that their priorities are pleasing people and corporations that are in power, not their users. It doesn't seem to be impacting normies much yet, but people I never expected to even think about alternative search engines are starting to experiment. Duck duck go could be a big beneficiary of this if they're able to deliver.
I'm extremely glad to have Kagi about now.
I see it the other way around. They’re sabotaging AI in order to maintain their dominance on search. If AI was to advance in some future form it might even substitute search altogether. By making it less reliable you keep your cash cow secure.
For their own AI, that's definitely possible, but with other strong competitors, that seems like a super risky move. They clearly are sabotaging their own AI, but I tend to think that's because their risk analysis indicated that regulators and influencers are more of a threat than users, so they are acting accordingly.
For the rest of the market you push the agenda of regulation because AI is potentially dangerous. More regulation means that the technology becomes less usable and its adoption is stalled. And that's something that Google is promoting for years, not just now that the field exploded.