The graphs aren't misleading (IMHO), they show the distribution of lengths. However you slice it, if you have to type the domain name, you have to push that number of keys. It's far more important to know that, than the ratio of the length normalized by the possible combinations of characters at that length. (I did try looking at that as well, but the graphs were almost meaningless - even at log scales, the increase in the number of combinations of characters dwarfs the number of names, and after you get more than 10 characters, the percentages drop to so small that comparing is meaningless).
"a lot of experts disagree with you on the importance of having a .com domain name". Well, yes they can! So go with the wisdom of the masses. It's a free market, and as a company you can select your own domain suffix. Yet most go for .COM, because well, right or wrong, that's what people expect. (I will agree that, in the end, it's not as important because, if you read my article I state that many now find web sites through typing keywords in search engines, and the exact domain is not important), but, Ask youself the question though: if you are company XYZZY, and there is a XYZZY.COM domain there, and it's not yours would you be just as happy with XYZZY.NET and not worry about it (Listening to those experts?) I think not, you want to preserve your brand, and avoid confussion, and make it as easy as possible for the masses to find your site (the non-experts who make up the majority of your consumers). It's the tastes of the fish, not the tastes of the fisherman after all :)
This article was written for fun. The couplet/triplet was generated out of interest and to see common combinations of letters. I find it fascinating, and I'll be happy to explain some business utility of it if you want to send me a personal email.
I'm not trying to sell my services as an expert domain name seller; it's not what I do. I make a living as someone who mines data and helps find 'inconsequential minutia' in data to leverage (when dealing with hundreds of millions of users, moving the needle just fraction of a percent can make a difference to a bottom line).
But anyway, the article was created as a trivia/fun article. I'm sorry you don't find it interesting/relevant. (Though again, wisdom of the crowd: since someone posted it here this morning, my inbox/twitter has been alive with comments/retweets about how fun and interesting an article it is - to date, it's been one of the most promiscious articles I've written)
Comments
Tough Crowd, Tough Crowd :)
The graphs aren't misleading (IMHO), they show the distribution of lengths. However you slice it, if you have to type the domain name, you have to push that number of keys. It's far more important to know that, than the ratio of the length normalized by the possible combinations of characters at that length. (I did try looking at that as well, but the graphs were almost meaningless - even at log scales, the increase in the number of combinations of characters dwarfs the number of names, and after you get more than 10 characters, the percentages drop to so small that comparing is meaningless).
"a lot of experts disagree with you on the importance of having a .com domain name". Well, yes they can! So go with the wisdom of the masses. It's a free market, and as a company you can select your own domain suffix. Yet most go for .COM, because well, right or wrong, that's what people expect. (I will agree that, in the end, it's not as important because, if you read my article I state that many now find web sites through typing keywords in search engines, and the exact domain is not important), but, Ask youself the question though: if you are company XYZZY, and there is a XYZZY.COM domain there, and it's not yours would you be just as happy with XYZZY.NET and not worry about it (Listening to those experts?) I think not, you want to preserve your brand, and avoid confussion, and make it as easy as possible for the masses to find your site (the non-experts who make up the majority of your consumers). It's the tastes of the fish, not the tastes of the fisherman after all :)
This article was written for fun. The couplet/triplet was generated out of interest and to see common combinations of letters. I find it fascinating, and I'll be happy to explain some business utility of it if you want to send me a personal email.
I'm not trying to sell my services as an expert domain name seller; it's not what I do. I make a living as someone who mines data and helps find 'inconsequential minutia' in data to leverage (when dealing with hundreds of millions of users, moving the needle just fraction of a percent can make a difference to a bottom line).
But anyway, the article was created as a trivia/fun article. I'm sorry you don't find it interesting/relevant. (Though again, wisdom of the crowd: since someone posted it here this morning, my inbox/twitter has been alive with comments/retweets about how fun and interesting an article it is - to date, it's been one of the most promiscious articles I've written)