Comment on Klára Dán von NeumannparentComments−tossandthrow2yGenerally, a lot of the article has the feel of rewriting the past in order please a modern political discourse.−nayuki2yExhibit one:During this time she also wrote the code for the first computer simulation of the Monte Carlo method, which is a method to store and analyze large quantities of data and make predictions on everything from elections to COVID-19 trend forecasting.−1f60c2yI didn't really get that (I only skimmed the article). However, it uses a lot of flowery language, which doesn't seem very WP:NPOV.−tossandthrow2yThe character of the language you describe is indeed what gave me that exact feel.−rottencupcakes2yI don’t feel like what I read between the lines of her life and the tone of this article are terribly in line.−MiguelX4132yWhat discourse would that be?−jgalt2122yThe DEI discourse.This article is missing information about Work and Notable Achievements.−HeatrayEnjoyer2yThe DEI discourse.I don't see DEI mentioned in the article anywhere.> This article is missing information about Work and Notable Achievements.What is the point of highlighting this string?−tossandthrow2yWhat makes you expect that the DEI discourse should be mentioned in the article? - it is after all, well, discourse.−HeatrayEnjoyer2yYou still haven't explained your point.−HeatrayEnjoyer2yThen it's not clear what your point is.−runlaszlorun2ySame question here.
Comments
Generally, a lot of the article has the feel of rewriting the past in order please a modern political discourse.
Exhibit one:
I didn't really get that (I only skimmed the article). However, it uses a lot of flowery language, which doesn't seem very WP:NPOV.
The character of the language you describe is indeed what gave me that exact feel.
I don’t feel like what I read between the lines of her life and the tone of this article are terribly in line.
What discourse would that be?
The DEI discourse.
I don't see DEI mentioned in the article anywhere.
What is the point of highlighting this string?
What makes you expect that the DEI discourse should be mentioned in the article? - it is after all, well, discourse.
You still haven't explained your point.
Then it's not clear what your point is.
Same question here.