Skip to content

Comment on Test firing of a 3D-printed rocket engine designed through computational modelparent

Comments

That's the wrong way to think about it.

"We've built a great new way to design physical structures."

"So what? The existing ways work just fine."

"We designed and built a rocket engine in two days."

However, even in the rocket field, there's a "design, simulate, build, test" cycle. They can do two of those steps in effectively 0 time and with significantly lower cost.

Moreover, it looks like the design has incremental feedback from something akin to simulate.

Who are you quoting? The second speaker in your conversation seems to have a pretty negative, incurious, and arrogant tone.

I'm quoting voices in my head having a discussion about this.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.