Skip to content

Comment on We must seek a widely-applicable science of systemsparent

Comments

Interesting! Have heard about Christopher Alexander's work, but have never really jumped in. Maybe I should do that now.

I'm of the opinion right now that what we call "design" and "architecture" is really just the science of finding stable habitable zones in high-dimensional problem spaces.

Wow! Yes! Agree with this view that all design and organisation is mostly just the most optimal/favorable state for the entire system to be in. What constitutes as favorability might be low free energy, high interconnect, distributedness etc.

May I suggest you to look into the work of Jeremy England in a similar light of self-assembly and optimisation in non-equilibrium states? Some really really interesting takeaways there, me sharing some of my interpretations might constitute as epistemic noise as I'm not sure if I understand each bit of it completely well at a 100%.

There was a great article about him in Quanta, and you might want to check out his talk at Karolinska Institutet.

Thanks for the recommendations, and I'll look out for your talk!

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.