I actually think the opposite is true. The review(s) you linked and a recent one by Mr. Mobile just showed me that these folks don’t really get the product. Likely because they’re not in the target demographic for this. Mr. Mobile admitted that much.
I think Patrick is the opposite. He’s a prolific reader. An endorsement from him makes me more convinced I’ll like this product.
I wouldn’t call the original post here a review, it’s more of a first impression. It seems to make a good first impression on someone who is in the target market.
Definitely some healthy skepticism needed, considering this was posted by an investor in the company who lent a preproduction model to the person in the video.
Comments
This review felt biased only highlighting positive aspects.
I saw this detailed review recently which talks about some negative things i.e. low contrast, viewing angles and some marketing bits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHeIw9rXzUQ
and while searching for this review again to post here, I their follow up on this review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ac-qtk2lmk
I actually think the opposite is true. The review(s) you linked and a recent one by Mr. Mobile just showed me that these folks don’t really get the product. Likely because they’re not in the target demographic for this. Mr. Mobile admitted that much.
I think Patrick is the opposite. He’s a prolific reader. An endorsement from him makes me more convinced I’ll like this product.
I wouldn’t call the original post here a review, it’s more of a first impression. It seems to make a good first impression on someone who is in the target market.
Definitely some healthy skepticism needed, considering this was posted by an investor in the company who lent a preproduction model to the person in the video.
the person in the video and the person tweeting it… are the same person
patio11 who often posts here in HN