Skip to content

Comment on Why SMBs Don't Deploy SSO

Comments

I'm largely in favor of SSO, but it's not without its downsides, going beyond capital costs: SSO can also be implemented in a way that introduces an onerous latency tax when using services.

Because of proxying? SSO (SAML/OAUTH2) are usually implemented with a token, like normal auth. There should be no penalty aside from login.

SSO can also be implemented in a way

Unless you're more specific, I'm going to assume that that "way" is the wrong way.

Initial login shouldn't add more latency than a couple web redirects. The authentication token/assertion should be validated only once and not be needed until it expires or the user logs out.

I’m not sure about that beyond login. That said, Okta has gotten reasonably good when you have a Yubikey, so I’ve stopped complaining about it.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.