Factually incorrect title, should be changed to "up to 2x" since the implicit comparison is to existing lithium-ion batteries used in the devices, not the far lower energy dense existing solid state batteries that the 100x applies to.
Article is also pretty worthless because it also implies that's the actual factor of improvement.
which offers the prospect of charging a MacBook once a month
Comments
Factually incorrect title, should be changed to "up to 2x" since the implicit comparison is to existing lithium-ion batteries used in the devices, not the far lower energy dense existing solid state batteries that the 100x applies to.
Article is also pretty worthless because it also implies that's the actual factor of improvement.