- Reasonable assumption would be from now moving forward. Last release was gpt-4o.
No, it is not reasonable to start with a minor release. Only if you want to stretch things to fit a narrative. Which we are free to disagree.
If you check other comments, I have talked about what I believe are their capacities and social impact. Downgrading it and calling the next major releases a marketing stunt is a opinion that we are fine to disagree, no?
Comments
You already failed then, gpt4 was released more than a year ago
Reasonable assumption would be from now moving forward. Last release was gpt-4o.
But there is little to engage with in your comment, I'd be most curious to explore on what u believe it's capacities might be, and societal impact.
- Reasonable assumption would be from now moving forward. Last release was gpt-4o.
No, it is not reasonable to start with a minor release. Only if you want to stretch things to fit a narrative. Which we are free to disagree.
If you check other comments, I have talked about what I believe are their capacities and social impact. Downgrading it and calling the next major releases a marketing stunt is a opinion that we are fine to disagree, no?
Tbh n+1 is pretty unambiguous, brand new models and not something like 3 to 3.5-turbo or 4 to 4o
hence the "predict", not "infer"
No. They've definitely been rolling out silent releases and in-between releases since GPT4.