Based on the article linked below, it seems that the money come from criminal activity:
Wen tried to buy a string of expensive houses in London, but struggled to pass money-laundering checks and her claims she had earned millions legitimately mining Bitcoin were not believed.
CPS chief crown prosecutor [..] said [...] cryptocurrencies "are increasingly being used by organised criminals to disguise and transfer assets [...]".
which is indeed money laundering, not tax evasion.
Sure, but what exactly was the criminal activity? Is the claim that she (or her close associates) engaged in it herself, or that she was acting purely as a launderer for others?
Wen was ultimately arrested and convicted of one count of money laundering after two trials and acquittals on 10 other counts. She was not accused of involvement in the original alleged China fraud.
Does this mean she wasn't the owner of those £2B in bitcoins? So they didn't caught the billionaire in question, they caught someone that was working for him or her
I didn't find it clear from either article that there was another "woman" behind the one that was caught (as opposed to any number of individuals of any gender)
Comments
What is "a crime linked to money laundering"? Was she convicted just of money laundering or had additional charges?
She claimed that she mined the Bitcoin. Did the prosecution find that she obtained it another way? If so which way?
Based on the article linked below, it seems that the money come from criminal activity:
which is indeed money laundering, not tax evasion.
Sure, but what exactly was the criminal activity? Is the claim that she (or her close associates) engaged in it herself, or that she was acting purely as a launderer for others?
More info here in links provided in sibling posts. From this one https://archive.ph/mTPuL,:
Clicking through the "More on this story" link, we find
Which sounds like she was facilitating money laundering without holding any criminal property herself. For a more comprehensive explanation, see e.g. https://www.jmw.co.uk/blog/business-money-laundering/three-m...
It sounds like what the US often calls "conspiracy to ...".
Does this mean she wasn't the owner of those £2B in bitcoins? So they didn't caught the billionaire in question, they caught someone that was working for him or her
I think the article was pretty clear that the woman caught was a front for the other woman.
I didn't find it clear from either article that there was another "woman" behind the one that was caught (as opposed to any number of individuals of any gender)
Sorry, there was more info in the articles linked in the discussion. This one, in particular:
https://archive.ph/mTPuL
from this thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40511214