This happens in other professions too where non-unionized folks manage unionized folks. The managers can make less because they don't have collective bargaining.
It doesn't make much sense in this particular case, but the assumption that managers should make more than workers is in fact kind of odd, and probably more of a reflection of power and hierarchies than the actual value-add of the work.
Comments
It doesn't make much sense in this particular case, but the assumption that managers should make more than workers is in fact kind of odd, and probably more of a reflection of power and hierarchies than the actual value-add of the work.