“Ancient Chesapeake site forces paleontologists to admit they were wrong after denying clear evidence of much older occupation across the Americas for decades.”
No paleontologists involved here. The article also isn't about forcing people to admit they're wrong, because preclovis is already widely accepted. It's about the tension in meeting the extremely high standard of evidence for that claim against the reality of the site's fragility and destruction.
Comments
“Ancient Chesapeake site forces paleontologists to admit they were wrong after denying clear evidence of much older occupation across the Americas for decades.”
Fixed the headline boss!
No paleontologists involved here. The article also isn't about forcing people to admit they're wrong, because preclovis is already widely accepted. It's about the tension in meeting the extremely high standard of evidence for that claim against the reality of the site's fragility and destruction.